🚚 complimentary SHIPPING on orders over $50 | ⭐ 4.5/5 from 778+ reviews
Toysβœ“ In StockπŸ”₯ Bestseller

Steiff Okapi Plush Toy Vintage

β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…4.5 out of 5(778 reviews)
Special Offer Price
$66.17
$110.28
Sale
βœ“ no-cost distribution on this item β€’ Limited time offer

SteiffOkapi

πŸ”’
Secure Checkout
🚚
express fulfillment

↩️
accessible Returns

πŸ“‹ Product Description

Steiff Okapi Plush Toy Vintage

Steiff
Okapi

This product is outstanding for anyone looking for quality Toys products.

πŸ“ Specifications

SKU: 1913240

Category: Toys > Stuffed Animals & Plush > Stuffed Animals

Original Price:$110.28 USD

Sale Price:$66.17 USD​

Availability: In Stock

Condition: Brand newly-released

🚚 dispatch & Returns

βœ“ at no charge shipment on orders over $50

Standard dispatch: 3-5 business days

Express dispatch: 1-2 business days (+$9.99)

30-Day Returns: Not satisfied? Return within 30 days for a full refund.

⭐ Recommended For You

4.5
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Based on 1962 reviews

JA
Joshua Allen βœ“ Verified Purchase
10 months ago Β· Kansas City, MO
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
leading purchase ever
To be fair, the Steiff Okapi Plush Toy Vintage is basic to use so no complaints.
41 people found this helpful
NH
Nicole Harris βœ“ Verified Purchase
6 months ago Β· Detroit, MI
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜†
Brilliant Steiff Okapi Plush Toy Vintage
The Steiff Okapi Plush Toy Vintage feels stable.
44 people found this helpful
KG
Kevin Green βœ“ Verified Purchase
2 months ago Β· Houston, TX
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Worth every penny
After a few days, the Steiff Okapi Plush Toy Vintage performs as expected so it’s acceptable. Packaging was basic.
9 people found this helpful
AR
Aaron Roberts βœ“ Verified Purchase
5 months ago Β· Portland, OR
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜†
truly pleased
Quality is decent for the price. Steiff Okapi Plush Toy Vintage is fine.
35 people found this helpful
LJ
Lisa Johnson βœ“ Verified Purchase
11 months ago Β· Indianapolis, IN
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Exceptional quality
So far, the Steiff Okapi Plush Toy Vintage is hassle-no-cost to use which is good enough.
47 people found this helpful