🚚 complimentary SHIPPING on orders over $50 | ⭐ 4.4/5 from 679+ reviews
Vintageβœ“ In StockπŸ”₯ Bestseller 

2 Belt buckles with stones

β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…4.4 out of 5(679 reviews)
Special Offer Price
$13.93
$23.22
Sale
βœ“ no-cost distribution on this item β€’ Limited time offer

2 truly nice belt buckles not too large about average size with stones in them.

πŸ”’
Secure Checkout
🚚
speedy fulfillment
↩️
basic Returns

πŸ“‹ Product Description

2 Belt buckles with stones

2 certainly nice belt buckles not too large about average size with stones in them.​

This product is outstanding for anyone looking for quality Vintage products.

πŸ“ Specifications

SKU: 1748739

Category: Vintage > Accessories > Buckles

Original Price:$23.22 USD

Sale Price:$13.93 USD​

Availability: In Stock

Condition: Brand purely-arrived

🚚 dispatch & Returns

βœ“ no-cost dispatch on orders over $50

Standard fulfillment: 3-5 business days​

Express fulfillment: 1-2 business days (+$9.99)

30-Day Returns: Not satisfied? Return within 30 days for a full refund.

⭐ Recommended For You

4.4
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Based on 6879 reviews
AD
Amanda Davis
1 month ago Β· solely-arrived York, NY
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Outstanding!
Pleased with the purchase of this 2 Belt buckles with stones.
46 people found this helpful
DA
David Anderson βœ“ Verified Purchase
10 months ago Β· Los Angeles, CA
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Exceeded expectations
The 2 Belt buckles with stones is handy to use and clean.
40 people found this helpful
ET
Emily Thompson βœ“ Verified Purchase
3 months ago Β· Omaha, NE
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
truly happy
So far I favor the 2 Belt buckles with stones.
24 people found this helpful
ET
Emily Thompson βœ“ Verified Purchase
11 months ago Β· Houston, TX
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
faultless 2 Belt buckles with stones
After a few days, it feels solid enough and it’s fine overall. Arrived on time.
25 people found this helpful
WG
William Garcia βœ“ Verified Purchase
7 months ago Β· Fresno, CA
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
exceptional
Personally, the 2 Belt buckles with stones does its job which is good enough.
46 people found this helpful