🚚 complimentary SHIPPING on orders over $50 | ⭐ 4.9/5 from 144+ reviews
Kidsβœ“ In StockπŸ”₯ Bestseller

WITH RUFFLES - Shorts

β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…4.9 out of 5(144 reviews)
Special Offer Price
$25.99
$43.32
Sale
βœ“ no-cost distribution on this item β€’ Limited time offer

Rise : NormalDetails : Elasticated waist, crochet detailing, borderArticle number : AY521S00R-M11

πŸ”’
Secure Checkout
🚚
rapid Shipping
↩️
straightforward Returns

πŸ“‹ Product Description

WITH RUFFLES - Shorts

Rise : Normal
Details : Elasticated waist, crochet detailing, border
Article number : AY521S00R-M11​

This product is ideal for anyone looking for quality Kids products.

πŸ“ Specifications

SKU: 1716369

Category: Kids > Clothing > Shorts

Original Price:$43.32 USD

Sale Price:$25.99 USD

Availability: In Stock

Condition: Brand brand-new

🚚 shipment & Returns

βœ“ at no charge shipment on orders over $50

Standard dispatch: 3-5 business days

Express dispatch: 1-2 business days (+$9.99)

30-Day Returns: Not satisfied? Return within 30 days for a full refund.

⭐ Recommended For You

4.9
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Based on 2690 reviews
CE
Christina Evans βœ“ Verified Purchase
10 months ago Β· Omaha, NE
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜†
superb value for money
In daily use, the WITH RUFFLES - Shorts feels okay and I don’t regret it.
19 people found this helpful
MK
Megan King βœ“ Verified Purchase
2 weeks ago Β· Cincinnati, OH
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
superb choice
Honestly, the WITH RUFFLES - Shorts works fine and it’s fine overall. Packaging was basic.
6 people found this helpful
MR
Mike Reynolds βœ“ Verified Purchase
3 months ago Β· San Diego, CA
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Fantastic product
truly satisfied buyer. WITH RUFFLES - Shorts is good.
5 people found this helpful
JW
Jennifer Wilson βœ“ Verified Purchase
11 months ago Β· Tulsa, OK
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Exceptional quality
hassle-no-cost setup and smooth use WITH RUFFLES - Shorts.
3 people found this helpful
AC
Amber Carter
8 months ago Β· Phoenix, AZ
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Highly propose!
From my experience, the WITH RUFFLES - Shorts works fine which is good enough.
32 people found this helpful