🚚 complimentary SHIPPING on orders over $50 | ⭐ 4.8/5 from 334+ reviews
Vintageβœ“ In StockπŸ”₯ Bestseller

Kodak Disk protector

β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…4.8 out of 5(334 reviews)
Special Offer Price
$6​
$10
Sale
βœ“ no-cost distribution on this item β€’ Limited time offer

UNO pened Kodak Disk protector.Please see pictures for further details.

πŸ”’
Secure Checkout
🚚
express fulfillment
↩️
accessible Returns

πŸ“‹ Product Description

Kodak Disk protector

UNO pened Kodak Disk protector.

Please see pictures for further details.

This product is outstanding for anyone looking for quality Vintage products.

πŸ“ Specifications

SKU: 309041

Category: Vintage > Electronics > Cameras

Original Price:$10 USD

Sale Price:$6 USD

Availability: In Stock

Condition: Brand newly-released

🚚 dispatch & Returns

βœ“ at no charge shipment on orders over $50

Standard dispatch: 3-5 business days​

Express dispatch: 1-2 business days (+$9.99)

30-Day Returns: Not satisfied? Return within 30 days for a full refund.

⭐ Recommended For You

4.8
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Based on 6204 reviews
BW
Brandon Wright βœ“ Verified Purchase
8 months ago Β· Columbus, OH
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Absolutely impeccable
The Kodak Disk protector performs as I expected it to.
32 people found this helpful
EY
Elizabeth Young βœ“ Verified Purchase
10 months ago Β· Pittsburgh, PA

β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜†
Five stars!
From my experience, the Kodak Disk protector feels solid and it meets expectations.
19 people found this helpful
MW
Michelle Walker βœ“ Verified Purchase
10 months ago Β· Minneapolis, MN
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
superb quality
So far, the Kodak Disk protector performs as expected and it meets expectations. Nothing fancy.
36 people found this helpful
AP
Adam Parker βœ“ Verified Purchase
9 months ago Β· Fort Worth, TX
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
So happy with this
Good material quality Kodak Disk protector.
8 people found this helpful
MW
Michelle Walker βœ“ Verified Purchase
6 months ago Β· Raleigh, NC
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Couldn't be happier
Personally, the Kodak Disk protector performs as expected so it’s acceptable. Works fine so far.
13 people found this helpful